Making up for past mistakes

Making up for past mistakes

"Take double the money that you found in your sacks, as it was probably someone's mistake. (Gen.43.12 NLT)

Can we really make up for past mistakes? What can you do to right the wrong of the past? If the past is past, what can the present do that will affect the past? The best you can do is do your best in the present. Is making up for past mistakes truly a mirage?

Is it okay for one to be remorseful when one realises that one has done wrong in the past. Yes it is. Starting now, you can change your ways and start doing right. Even when we say sorry, it most times only alleviate the pain of the one wronged. 

Our text show how Jacob tells his children to take double what was found in their sack. He was trying to make up for the wrong of the past. The story of Zacchaeus comes to mind when he told Jesus that he was going to give back fourfold whatever he had collected by false accusation from others. 

"And Zacchaeus stood, and said unto the Lord; Behold, Lord, the half of my goods I give to the poor; and if I have taken any thing from any man by false accusation, I restore him fourfold. (Luke.19.8 KJV)

But can he make restitution for the trauma, the missed opportunities and the pains? The best we can do is the best we can. Jesus did not initiate this, neither did he okayed nor condemned it. What can a man give in exchange for his soul? This was not a requirement for salvation. 

"Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul? (Mark.8.37 KJV) 

You may not be able to make up for the past, but you do right in the present. 

Good day,
Have a great day today,
Emmanuel Okoro,
(aka Mr. Lift) 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What's in a name?

Image
What's in a name?  "He named him Noah, saying, "This one will give us a break from the hard work of farming the ground that GOD cursed." (Gen.5.29)  Names have prophetic attributes in them. When a thing is named, the name defines what it does and what it cannot do. When a person is named, his future is foretold, especially when the persons parents are in tune with the agenda of God. But that person has to work to bring that prophecy to reality.  John the baptist was a case in point when the wrong name would have been given. If the parent had not listened and obeyed God's instruction but instead bow to family and societal pressure.  "And his mother answered and said, Not so; but he shall be called John." (Luke.1.60)  Another example is Benjamin, the second son from the loved-wife of Jacob. As the mother was dying from the pain of childbirth, he called the child Benoni but his father says not so, he shall be called Benjamin  "With her las...
Read more

Jesus is the answer to the sin problem

Jesus is the answer to the sin problem  "When he served as a sacrifice for our sins, he solved the sin problem for good--not only ours, but the whole world's". (1John.1.2 MSB) When Adam and Eve sinned in the Garden of Eden, the sin passed through them to all men. And so the Bible recorded that all have sinned and come short of the glory of God.  "Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:" (Rom.5.12)  But that was just the beginning of the story. Sin entered the world, and death came as a result of sin. It appears that mankind was doomed.  But Jesus came and served the punishment for sin and in so doing, He solved the sin problem for good. Now mankind has access once again to the Father. Now everything the Father has for us is at our disposal. Now we can reign by Jesus Christ and receive the abundance that God has for us.  "For if by one man's offence death reigned b...
Read more

"Law man" or God's man

Image
The law in one sense was a defective reflection of God. It reflected who God is; though not a perfect reflection. The law says don't steal, God does not steal. The law says do not lie, God does not lie, etc. But there was more to God that law could not show or give to us. As a result, God has given us His grace. His grace was not just a reflection of Himself but was God Himself. The law would should you what to do but could not grant you the ability to do it but grace did not just show you, He did it for us. The essence of the law was to satisfy God but grace came and did that on behalf of mankind. The reason why the Apostle says here that he quiets being a 'law man' but instead became God's man "What actually took place is this: I tried keeping rules and working my head off to please God, and it didn't work. So I quit being a "law man" so that I could be God's man". (Gal.2.18 MSG) Are you 'law man' who is still strivi...
Read more